The other day I was debugging a crash in a UI test for an open pull request at work. The bug turned out to be extremely subtle and difficult to notice. I spent way too much time staring at the changes, trying to understand what was wrong. Let’s see if you can spot the error.

Here’s the problematic line:

func toDictionary() -> [String: Any] {
    var dict: [String: Any] = [:]

    // code setting other keys and values...

    dict[JSONKeys.dateClosed] = self.dateClosed?.toMongoDate

    return dict

The details here don’t matter. This is some legacy JSON serialization code, predating the introduction of Codable (SE-0166 and SE-0167). This function serializes the object to a JSON dictionary, self.dateClosed is a Date type, and JSONKeys.dateClosed is a String constant.

But what’s the bug? Let’s look at the definition of toMongoDate (also some legacy code).

extension Date {
    func toMongoDate() -> [String: Any] {
        // return date in expected mongo date format

Seems fine, right? Everything compiles. There’s no issue with putting a [String: Any] dictionary as the value in another [String: Any] dictionary. Any can be any type. But that’s what the problem turned out to be.

Let’s look at that line again: self.dateClosed?.toMongoDate. This returns the function toMongoDate. That is, the reference type () -> [String: Any]not the result of calling the function. I forgot the parentheses (). That line should read self.dateClosed?.toMongoDate(). However, this worked and the compiler did not complain because functions are first class types, and setting a function as the value of a [String: Any] dictionary is valid. This is clearly an argument for adopting Codable, which would have prevented this mistake.

What’s worse: this exact error has happened in our code base in at least one other scenario. It’s so easy to overlook.

Much faceplam.